Linear vs. Cyclical Eschatology

Linear vs. Cyclical Eschatology: Is Jesus’ Generation the Climax? When it comes to the "Day of the Lord" and end-times prophecy, two lenses dominate: the linear approach and a cyclical view. The debate shapes how we interpret Jesus’ words and the unfolding of history—particularly the role of His generation. The Linear Approach: A Future Fixation The linear model pushes all prophecy into a distant future, culminating in a single, cataclysmic event. In Matthew 24:34, Jesus says, “This generation will not pass away until all these things have happened,” yet many linear interpreters defer this to a modern or future tribulation, including the "great distress" (v. 21) and His return (v. 30). The destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD is seen as a mere shadow, with the real Day of the Lord—complete with the Rapture and global judgment—still pending. This view, bolstered by 19th-century dispensationalism, often leaves signs like wars and famines (v. 6–7) feeling perpetually unfu...